UZBEKISTAN Alexander Korobeinikov and Alissa Inshakova A. LEGISLATION AND RULES A.1 Legislation Arbitration in Uzbekistan continues to be governed by domestic legislation, as well as by international treaties ratified by Uzbekistan. Uzbekistan is a party to a number of international and regional treaties that relate to arbitration, including the New York Convention and several CIS treaties. Additionally, Uzbekistan is a member state of the ICSID, and investors, therefore, have the right to seek settlement of…
UKRAINE Ihor Siusel and Kseniia Pogruzhlska A. LEGISLATION AND RULES A.1 Legislation Ukraine is a civil law country,…
TURKEY Ismail G. Esin, Ali Selim Demirel and Ceyda Sıla Cetinkaya A. LEGISLATION AND RULES A.1 Legislation The…
Abstract:Polish Civil Procedure Code is now clear on the arbitrability of corporate matters. Background Polish civil procedure law has recently been subject to a wave of amendments. They were various in nature, purpose and magnitude. Some were just a confirmation of already established practice, and others could be classified as a reform of the core of the Polish civil court system. All of them, however, were promoted as aiming to ease bureaucracy and make legal…
The Appellate Court in Wrocław, Poland [Case No. I ACa 1109/17[1]] considered the question of whether the principle…
In Micula v. Romania,[1] a D.C. district court judge recently enforced an investor-state arbitration award in a case…
On 20 September 2019, ICSID registered a request by the Austrian construction company STRABAG SE (“Strabag”) for the initiation of an ICSID arbitration proceeding (ICSID Case No. ARB/19/29). Strabag and two of its affiliates (“Erste Nordsee-Offshore Holding GmbH” and “Zweite Nordsee-Offshore Holding GmbH”) are suing the Federal Republic of Germany for damages in a still unknown amount. So far, no documents are public except for the notification of a request for arbitration. The notification, however, clearly shows…
In Tennant Energy LLC (USA) v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2018-54), a NAFTA tribunal addressed the…
In its decision dated 28 May 2019 (case No. 4A_543/2018 (in German), selected for publication in the official…
The Achmea decision and its aftermath are still a hot topic in the international arbitration community. In the Achmea decision, the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) ruled that EU law precluded resolution of intra-EU disputes through investment arbitration (see https://www.globalarbitrationnews.com/ecj-stops-investment-arbitration-intra-eu/ and https://www.globalarbitrationnews.com/aftermath-achmea-germany-requests-dismissal-vattenfall-case-cjeus-achmea-decision/). The question of whether this decision could interfere with ISDS under the Energy Charter Treaty (“ECT”) as well, was first and in the negative answered by the Tribunal in the ICSID case Vattenfall…