Rogers v. Swepi LP, No. 18-3229 (6th Cir. Dec. 10, 2018) [click for opinion] In 2011, Matt Rogers entered into a lease agreement governing oil and gas extraction from Rogers’s five-acre property in Ohio (the “Agreement”) with SWEPI LP and Shell Energy Holding GP LLC (together, “Shell”). The Agreement provided that Rogers would receive a $5,000-per-acre signing bonus upon Shell’s verification of his good title to the property. Rogers did not receive the signing bonus…
Starke v. SquareTrade, Inc., No. 17-2474-cv (2d Cir. Jan. 10, 2019) [click for opinion] In January 2016, Plaintiff…
Novic v. Credit One Bank, N.A., No. 17-2168 (4th Cir. Jan 4, 2019) [click for opinion] Charleene Novic…
SteppeChange LLC v. VEON Ltd., No. 18-cv-04842 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2018) [click for opinion] Plaintiff SteppeChange, LLC (“SteppeChange”) a California-based tech company, was involved in two projects, under two separate oral agreements, with Dutch cellular phone and data service provider VEON Ltd. (“VEON”), and its Italian subsidiary, Wind Tre S.p.A. (“Wind” and collectively with VEON, “Defendants”). The first project involved developing a customer messaging platform (the “Button Project”), and the second involved developing a…
Skuse v. Pfizer, Inc., No. A-3027-17T4 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Jan. 16, 2019) [click for opinion] In…
Am. Int’l Specialty Lines Ins. Co. v. Allied Capital Corp., Index. No. 656341/16, 2018 NY Slip Op 07194…
Forby v. One Technologies, L.P., No. 17-10883 (5th Cir. Nov. 28, 2018) [click for opinion] On April 24, 2015, Vickie Forby filed a class action in state court in Illinois against One Technologies, L.P. (“One Tech”) for violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (“ICFA”). The case was later removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. In the notice of removal, One Tech did not…
Gen. Re Life Corp. v. Lincoln Nat’l Life Ins. Co., No. 17-2496-cv (2d Cir. Nov. 28, 2018) [click…
Stati v. Kazakhstan, No. 14-cv-1638 (D.D.C. Nov. 13, 2018) [click for opinion] On March 23, 2018, the District Court…
Dye v. Tamko, No. 17-14-052 (11th Cir. Nov. 2, 2018) [click for opinion] Two Florida residents purchased the same type of “Heritage 30” shingles (hereinafter “the shingles”) from Tamko Building Products (“Tamko”) for their respective roofs. The shingles came with a 30-year limited warranty, the language of which was printed in full on the outside wrapper of each shingle package. This limited warranty contained a mandatory arbitration clause that was also printed in its entirety, and…