Vividus LLC v. Express Scripts, Inc., No. 16-16187 (9th Cir. Dec. 21, 2017) [click for opinion] Petitioners-Appellants Vividus, LLC f/k/a HM Compounding Services and HMX Services, LLC (collectively, “HMC”) and other individuals filed suit in New York state court against a number of pharmacy benefit managers, including Express Scripts and CVS/Caremark Corp., alleging violations of antitrust laws. The case was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, where the…
Leidos, Inc. v. Hellenic Republic, No. 17-7082 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 6, 2017) [click for opinion] The case arises…
Weirton Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Cmty. Health Sys., No. 5:15-cv-00132 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 12, 2017) [click for opinion]…
Before bringing an action in a U.S. federal court, a party should examine various considerations. Venue is one such consideration that is often overlooked. Even if a court has personal jurisdiction over an entity and subject matter jurisdiction over the matter to be decided, the question of whether the court is the appropriate venue still must be evaluated. In short, venue asks whether the court hearing the matter has a substantial connection to the dispute.…
Meduri Farms, Inc. v. DutchTecSource B.V., No. 3:17-cv-906 (D. Or. Dec. 5, 2017) [click for opinion] Plaintiff Meduri…
Simply Wireless, Inc. v. T-Mobile US, Inc., No. 16-1123 (4th Cir. Dec. 13, 2017) [click for opinion] In…
Yang v. Majestic Blue Fisheries, LLC, No. 15-16881 (9th Cir. Nov. 30, 2017) [click for opinion] Mr. Yang was a fisherman on a vessel owned by Majestic Blue Fisheries, LLC (“Majestic”), a Delaware entity and affiliate of Dongwon Indus. Co., Ltd. (“Dongwon”), a Korean entity. Although Majestic owned the vessel, Dongwon was required to supply the vessel’s crew and to supervise the vessel’s repair and maintenance. Despite known mechanical issues with the vessel, on May…
This table can provide a general overview only. The rules listed may not be applicable in all circumstances.…
We are pleased to announce that the eleventh edition of The Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook is now available. Leading…
Overview Following debate within the arbitration community regarding the proper scope of the role of a tribunal secretary and a series of challenges to arbitral awards based on the alleged improper exercise of that role, the London Court of International Arbitration (“LCIA”) recently updated its Notes for Arbitrators, with a particular focus on implementing new guidelines on the use of tribunal secretaries (cf. short note on ICC’s and LCIA’s Revised Practice Notes). These changes primarily…